Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Bike Fed seeks boots on the ground

State cycling advocacy group looking for help in pedestrian traffic count


Spin Daily staff


The Bicycle Federation of Wisconsin will be conducting pedestrian traffic counts throughout Madison in September.

Counts will take place Sept. 10 and 14, at 60 locations across Madison, according to a release from the federation.

Prior to the counts, the Bike Fed will be conducting training meetings for volunteer counters from 6 to 8 p.m. Wednesday, Sept. 4, and from 10 a.m. to noon and 1 to 3 p.m., Saturday, Sept. 7. The locations of the Madison training sessions have not yet been announced, according to the statement.

The counts will be used to help improve pedestrian facilities in the community, the release said.


To see a list of counting locations, and to sign up to assist the Bike Fed, click on this link: http://wisconsinbikefed.org/2013/08/27/volunteers-needed-city-wide-bicyclist-and-pedestrian-counts-in-madison/

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

The Courier: Waterloo board discusses concern over cyclists

Board member says town not contacted about July 4 race


By Anita J. Martin Courier correspondent



WATERLOO — The Town of Waterloo Board heard from several of the roughly 20 people that attended all or part of the Aug. 14 monthly meeting.

Tom Schuler with USA Cycling, Brandon Hohlstein with Madison Area Sports Commission, and Police Officer R. McIntyre talked about the July 4 race, and Steve and Margaret Bauer with Move to Amend Rock River Affiliate, Dr. Dan Fary, and a number of others addressed the Citizens United Decision.

Schuler, who introduced himself to those in attendance, got the discussion rolling about the recent bike event. Describing himself as a lifelong cyclist and former U.S. Olympic Cycling Team athlete, he said, “It pains me to see cycling getting such a black eye here and elsewhere.”


To read the rest of the story please click here:
http://www.hngnews.com/waterloo_marshall/news/local/article_ee18e7e8-09ee-11e3-94d7-001a4bcf6878.html



Madison area 'cross practices on for 2013

Badger Prairie Park, Verona, to host training sessions


Spin Daily staff


Following a winter of uncertainty, there will be Madison area cyclocross practices in 2013 — and they start in ernest.

Badger Prairie Park, Verona, will host the first practice of the season at 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, Aug. 28, according to an email from Joe Maloney, University of Wisconsin cycling team member.

The team will be conducting the weekly practice sessions, which will meet at the shelter near the soccer fields at the park, he said.

This week, the practice will focus on general skills, rather than a simulated race course. Skills will include, practicing race starts, running over barriers, in addition to general on-bike skills.

Donations will be accepted to help cover the cost of putting on the practices, Maloney said, but for now there is no cost to participate.

Badger Prairie was the site of the USA Cycling cyclocross national championships in 2011 and 2012.

The Active Pursuit: Cyclist killed in northeast Wisconsin

Death is ninth in 2013 on Wisconsin roads


By Tom Held, The Active Pursuit


A motorist passing a pick-up truck and horse trailer near Seymour killed a 48-year-old bicyclist and triathlete on a training ride Saturday night, according to the Outagamie County Sheriff’s Department.

Kevin Payette, a husband and father of two girls, became the ninth bicyclist killed in a crash with a motor vehicle in Wisconsin this year.

According to Sheriff’s Capt. Mike Jobe, a 73-year-old driver from Bridgeton, N.J., crossed the center line while eastbound on Highway VV, near Highway Y, and collided head-on with Payette, who was traveling westbound about 6 p.m. The motorist reported he was focused on the truck he was passing and did not see Payette traveling on the roadway, Jobe said.

To see the entire story, please follow this link:

http://theactivepursuit.com/motorist-passing-horse-trailer-killed-bicyclist-in-outagamie-county/

Cyclocross clinic comes to Milwaukee


My Wife Inc, Ben's Cycles to host session for beginners


Spin Daily staff


Wisconsin cyclocross team My Wife Inc. and Ben's Cycles will be conducting a clinic for beginners Saturday, Aug. 31 at Kosciuszko Park, Milwaukee.

The clinic will be held from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the park located at 2201 S. 7th St., according to an email from Paul Warloski, an organizer for the clinic.

During the clinic there will be large group instruction, in addition to work in smaller groups, the email states. 

Monday, August 26, 2013

Daily Herald report: Chicago area bike race to cease in 2014

Schedule conflict sinks Tour of Elk Grove


By Steve Zalusky of The Daily Herald
The Alexian Brothers Tour of Elk Grove, the Chicago region's most prominent cycling event, will cease operations because of a scheduling conflict with USA Cycling and the International Cycling Union, Elk Grove Village Mayor Craig Johnson announced Sunday.
In an open letter published in Sunday's Daily Herald, Johnson writes that a decision by cycling's governing bodies to extend the Tour of Utah's dates will put it in conflict with the The Tour of Elk Grove, depriving the suburban event of the opportunity to attract top riders as it has during its 8-year run.
"Therefore, after much thought and with a heavy heart, we are left no alternative but to cease the Alexian Brothers Tour of Elk Grove," Johnson writes in a letter also signed by Elk Grove Village trustees. "We have always promised that we will only run our cycling event at the highest level and we are greatly disappointed in having to make this decision to end the race."
The Elk Grove event drew dozens of top cyclists from across the world, and hundreds of spectators, to the village each year. Besides presenting elite-level cycling, the event served as a fundraiser for groups such as the Heart of a Marine Foundation, Elk Grove Rotary, and Fallen Soldier Memorial Scholarships.
"Alexian Brothers Health System was the title sponsor of the Tour of Elk Grove for the past 8 years. We were dismayed to learn of the cancellation of the event due to scheduling conflicts," said Alexian Brothers Spokesman Matt Wakely. "The annual cycling tour provided a great opportunity for the community, our Health System and area residents to participate in a world class event."
The Tour of Utah this year was held beginning Tuesday, Aug. 6, two days after the Tour of Elk Grove ended. The setup, Johnson said, allowed top racers to compete in both events.
"Teams could come and race our race, leave Sunday night, fly out to Utah, have that Monday to set up and train a little bit, and then race on Tuesday," he said Sunday.
Elk Grove has tried to partner with the Utah event's organizers to share costs, but their offers have been rebuffed, he added.
In his open letter, Johnson writes that Tour of Utah organizers have been pressing for years to change the Tour of Elk Grove's dates to allow them to hold a road stage to compliment its mountain stages. In order to do so, USA Cycling and the ICU have agreed to allow the Tour of Utah to begin next year on a Monday instead of a Tuesday.
"We know if they start Monday, it's impossible for teams to go from Elk Grove straight to Utah to race (the next day)," Johnson said.
UCI officials and Tour of Utah officials have encouraged Tour of Elk Grove organizers to find a new date, but that's something Johnson said they're unwilling to do.
"We have been the first weekend of August all the time, in our eight years of running the race," he said, adding that the dates were selected to avoid conflicts with the start of the school year and other major suburban events like the Arlington Million.
"It always worked ideally for us to have it there (at that time)," he said. "One, it works in the community, two, it works regionally and, three, we were able to attract the best riders we could."
David Simmons, president of Friends of Cycling in Elk Grove, said he was disappointed in the cancellation because of what the race brought to the village.
"I loved the race. It raised the attention that was paid to cycling in the area and that was great," Simmons said. "You could see guys who raced in the Tour de France racing down Elk Grove Boulevard."
Friends of Cycling in Elk Grove promoted the event and gave away bikes and accessories at the sponsor expo, but wasn't involved with planning the race.
"It's not going to deter what we want to do," Simmons said. "As much as we enjoyed the weekend and the way it helped us raise the knowledge of cycling and advocacy, we're not going to stop working toward our goal, which is to get people out riding their bikes."
A representative of USA Cycling could not me reached for comment Sunday. In a letter dated July 29 but emailed two weeks later, Pat McQuaid, president of the Switzerland-based International Cycling Union, and Christophe Hubschmid, its general director, notified Tour of Elk Grove organizers of the scheduling change.
"We encourage you to work closely with (USA Cycling) to either remain with your August date or to investigate other possibilities, such as moving the event to a date closer to the Philadelphia Cycling Classic (held in early June)."
Johnson said calling off the race was a difficult decision because of the negative consequences it will have not just locally, but on the sport of cycling in the United States.
"We are, outside the Tour of California, in the largest television market that any professional race is covered," he said. "It's a shame because I think it's going to hurt cycling here in America as we try and work hard to build it up."
Marco Colbert, a Lincolnshire resident and USA Cycling race director, said the Tour of Elk Grove is one of the major events on the calendar for area riders.
"That would be quite a loss," Colbert said. "The Tour of Elk Grove has become a fixture in the Chicago area in the first week of August. It has had some big names in pro cycling. It would be quite a shame."
Colbert said he could see where Elk Grove does not necessarily have the flexibility to move the date.
"The calendar is so filled up with events that it's very difficult to move around on the calendar," he said. "Once you get a spot that's working for you, you tend to want to stay there. It's like dominoes. When you change one event, it impacts other events."
Simmons agreed and said that while it would be possible to hold a Tour of Elk Grove for amateur cyclists only, it would be hard to reschedule for the professionals.
"I got the sense that planning was going to be difficult this year because of the conflict. I never thought it was going to be canceled, but then again I wasn't completely surprised," Simmons said. "It's be great if some kind of compromise could be made, but right now it seems final unfortunately."
In his open letter, Johnson places blame for the event's cancellation squarely on the sport's governing bodies.
"In closing, the Alexian Brothers Tour of Elk Grove had a great 8-year run," he writes. "Both Elk Grove and the entire Chicago region were prominently showcased throughout the world. We encourage everyone to continue to support cycling at all levels. Finally, we express our great disappointment that National and International accommodations could not have been made to carry our race date forward."
Staff writer Melissa Silverberg contributed to this report.

Monday, February 11, 2013

WI Non-sanctioned racing calendar set


Wisport announces 2013 racing schedule


spindailynews@gmail.com


The moment many Wisconsin cycling fans clamor for all winter has arrived — the unveiling of the upcoming racing season schedules.
Recently, Wisport, the state's non-sanctioned racing organization, released its schedule.
The calendar opens April 20 with a traditional "friendly century" in Willard, and finishes with Wisport Worlds events in western Wisconsin Sept. 15.
Wisport's calendar includes several traditional races such as the Brice Prairie Time Trial and Holmen Y-30 Road Race, June 29, and 30, respectively, and Cleghorn road race Sept. 8.
The new list does include a few first time events, and the return of a race.
New to calendar are a time trial in Park Falls the same day as the Flambeau 40 road race Aug. 31, and the Ashley For the Arts road race in Arcadia, Aug. 10.
The Blue Mounds Classic road race is back on the calendar, after a year hiatus.
Wisport is defined as non-sanctioned because it does not require riders to have a USA Cycling racing license to participate. The Wisconsin Cycling Association (WCA) one of Wisconsin's other racing leagues does require a USA Cycling license, thereby being a sanctioned racing organization.
For more on the non-sanctioned racing season please visit, www.wisport.org.


Source: www.wisport.org

Day
Date
Race & Flyer
Website
Location
Scoring
Type
Sat
 Apr 20 2013

Willard WI
WISport
Ride
Sat
Apr 27 2013 
Pedal for Proceeds

WISport/Menzel
RR
Sat
May 4 2013

Willard WI
 WISport
 TT







 Sat
Jun 1 2013 
Rib Falls Time Trial 
Site 
Rib Falls WI 
Wisport 
TT 
 Sat
Jun 8 2013 
WISport 
TT 







Sat
Jun 29 2013
Site
WISport
 TT
Sun
Jun 30 2013
Site
WISport
RR
Sat
Jul 6 2013
Greenwood WI
WISport/Menzel
RR
Sun
Jul 7 2013
Greenwood WI
WISport
TT
Sat
Jul 13 2013
WISport
RR
Sat
Jul 20 2013
WISport
RR







Sat
Aug 3 2013
Grand View Firehouse 50 RR
WISport
RR
Sat
Aug 3 2013
Grand View Firehouse 50 TT
Site
WISport
TT
Sat
Aug 3 2013
Fantasy Fifty Road Race
Site
WISport
RR
Sat
Aug 10 2013
Ashley For the Arts RR (New)
Arcidia WI
WISport
RR
Sun
Aug 11 2013
WISport World Championship RR
Site
Fountain City WI
WISport
RR
Sat
Aug 17 2013
Wisport
TT
 Sun
Aug 18 2013 
Real Wheelin' Bike race
 Site
Mauston WI 
WISport 
RR 
Sat
Aug 31 2013 
Flambeau 40 Road Race 
Site 
WISport 
RR 
Sat
Aug 31 2013 
Flambeau Time Trial (New)
Site 
WISport 
TT 
 Sun
Sep 8 2013 
Site 
WISport 
RR 
 Sun
Sep 8 2013 
Site 
WISport 
RR
Sat 
Sep 14 2013 
Held
Site 

WISport 

 Sun
Sep 15 2013
Held
 Site

WIsport 



WISport Awards Celebration

Fountain City WI
WISport
Ride










Friday, January 11, 2013

From the Federation

Bike Fed delves into bike statewide bicycle project funding

The Bicycle Federation of Wisconsin occasionally shares content with Spin Daily. Enjoy.

More than $$: understanding transportation funding

A couple of days ago I published a blog post in which I tried to give readers some idea of what sort of funds for bicycle programs might be available in our next state budget. I did my best to put real numbers with dollar signs into a spread sheet that compared what we used to spend, with what is now available from the feds and what the Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources and the Dept. of Transportation have in their biennial budget requests for 2013-2015. I also asked the budget folks in each department to look over my numbers to see how accurate they are. I have since heard back that while nothing is final, my numbers are accurate enough for discussion purposes. You can see them in the spreadsheet below:


Click image for a larger view.

While I did my best to pull back the emerald curtain, the issue of transportation funding is more complicated that just reporting about the dollar amounts. Some readers still had questions and asked that I take a step back and define some of the terms I used and give a higher level view of how our transportation funding system works. Well, I’m game if you are; who wants to get wonky with me?
Before we really get into it, one reader asked that I define some of the terms in the chart above. I hear that request and raise you one. Below I give a comprehensive definition of the most commonly used and misunderstood terms in the world of transportation funding:

Allocation:An administrative distribution of funds for programs that (usually) do not have statutory distribution formulas. Allocations usually are for discretionary programs. However, the National Recreational Trails Funding Program allocated funds to the States in FY 1993, 1996, and 1997 by statutory formula. There were no funds in FY 1992, 1994, or 1995.
Apportionment:The distribution of funds as prescribed by a statutory formula.
Rescission:A federal rescission of funds reduces the amount of federal funds provided through previous federal legislation. Rescissions typically target unobligated funds and allow states to choose what programs to cut to meet the rescission. Bike and ped programs are usually rescinded at a much higher rate than highway programs. There were rescissions in FY 2001-2011, but no additional rescissions in 2012.
Obligation:The Federal government’s legal commitment or promise to reimburse the States for the Federal share of a program or project’s eligible costs.
Obligational Authority:The total amount of funds that may be obligated in a year. For the Federal-aid Highway Program this is comprised of the obligation limitation amount plus amounts for programs exempt from the limitation.
Obligation Limitation:A restriction, or “ceiling” on the amount of Federal assistance that may be promised (obligated) during a specified time period. This is a statutory budgetary control that does not affect the apportionment or allocation of funds. Rather, it controls the rate at which these funds may be used.
Obligation Rate:Percent of obligations compared to the amount available (apportioned and allocated) to the State. Wisconsin’s obligation rate for bicycle programs is lower than its obligation authority, which means the State is spending its bicycle funds at a lower rate than allowed by Federal-aid highway program.
Programed:The amount of money in projects actually scheduled for a program in a given year. Sometimes the programmed amount is more or less than the budgeted amount because either planned projects were delayed or old projects finally did get completed.
Budgeted:The amount of money the state plans to make available for a program in a given year. Sometimes the programmed amount is more or less than the budgeted amount because either planned projects were delayed or old projects finally did get completed.
These terms and definitions are key to understanding how we spend our money, or don’t spend our money on bicycle programs. For instance, Wisconsin’s obligation rate for the Transportation Enhancements program is about 48%, one of the lowest in the nation. That means we have traditionally spent less than half of the money the feds gave us in one of the most important funding programs for bicycle and pedestrian projects. To compound that, our obligation rate after rescissions is 91%, which means when the feds come calling for any unobligated funds to try to balance their books, we give back the bike money at a much higher rate than highway money.
The definitions will also be useful if you are looking at any of the charts that rate or compare how well different states fund bicycle and pedestrian programs. Like this one that compares state spending onRecreational Trails Program, or this one that compares Transportation Enhancement spending.

Feds first


The first thing you need to understand is that virtually all of our money for bicycle programs and projects comes from the federal government. The most recent federal transportation bill is called Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21). MAP-21 is a two-year bill that made quite a few changes to how bicycle programs were funded. You can learn more about those changes in this blog post, but the top-down system in which most bike money comes from the federal government remains unchanged.
In Wisconsin, pretty much the only state dollars spent on cycling comes from our state trail passes, and that only amounts to between $1 million and $1.3 million annually, a proverbial drop in the bucket.  You can see in the pie charts below, the amounts are in the thousands of millions of dollars, and our total state transportation budget request is for $6.6 billion.


Source: WisDOT 2013-15 Biennial Budget Highlights Department Budget Request, p. 5

Note the bicycle slice of the pie is so small, the good folks at WisDOT don't put it in their chart.

Here is a slightly more colorful chart I made that includes all requested bicycle and pedestrian program funds.
As you can see by the more colorful, but depressing, chart I made, bicycle and pedestrian programs only account for about 1.3% of all state transportation dollars. Remember that trips made by biking and walking account for about 12% of all trips taken in Wisconsin and 9% of all fatal crashes. Of those fatal crashes, the majority are the fault of the person behind the wheel of the motor vehicle involved. Given those statistics, why are walking and bicycling getting such a disproportionately tiny piece of the transportation funding pie? And why is our piece 30% smaller this federal budget than last?
If this was a Thanksgiving and I was served that little piece of pie, I’d either think I need to go on a diet or grandma doesn’t love me any more. Given how little money is allocated for bike stuff, it is a wonder we have it as good as we do in Wisconsin. The secret is that bike and ped projects are incredibly inexpensive compared to highway projects and have a much higher return on investment. Consider that Portland, arguably the best major city for bicycling in the country has only spent about $60 million on all their bike projects combined over the last decade. Meanwhile, it is going to cost $350 million to re-deck the 2.2 mile long the Hoan Bridge. So for $60 million, you can buy an international reputation as the best city for cycling in the United States, but $350 million only gets you a new deck on an old bridge most people outside of Milwaukee have never heard of.
There are a number of reasons finding money for walking and bicycling programs is like squeezing water from a stone. Since the advent of the automobile, traffic engineering programs have been biased in favor of moving motor vehicles rather than people. Then there are the large lobby groups for highways. Recently the most (but not all) TEA Party members have argued that the federal government has no business building facilities for bicycling or walking since those trips are all local or perhaps state at best. Perhaps the biggest reason bike and ped programs are being squeezed is that our transportation infrastructure for motor vehicles has been underfunded for so long, that our roads and bridges are literally falling apart.
Despite the hunger for more and wider highways, there is just no appetite for raising gas taxes are the federal or state level. The federal gas tax has not been raised since 1993 and Wisconsin froze our gas tax in 2006. Meanwhile, motor vehicles are getting better fuel economy,  people are driving fewer miles and at the same time, the cost of building and maintaining highways keeps getting more expensive. This sort of quadruple wammy has forced the governments to borrow more and cut back on maintenance at the expense of expansion. But don’t take it from me, listen to what Governor Walker’s Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy Commission has to say about our transportation funding crisis in Wisconsin:
Since 2006 when motor fuel tax indexing was repealed, inflation has reduced the buying power of the state motor fuel tax by nearly 13 percent.
The state’s decision to issue bonds to address the loss of revenues led to debt payments of $762 million in the 2011-13 biennium. Assuming a similar level of bonding over the next 10 years, debt service will consume one-quarter of all state transportation revenues by FY 2023.
In light of the difficulty politicians have raising any taxes these days and their traditional reluctance to tell lobbyists and constituents we can’t afford to maintain the transportation system we have now, let alone increase capacity, everyone from Washington to our town boards are looking for every penny they can cut from politically expendable programs and put those pennies into highways. Guess what, even though every trip involves some walking and about half of the adults in the US ride bikes, we don’t squawk much when we don’t get our fair share of the pie. I guess people who ride bikes and walk a lot just aren’t complainers and the squeaky wheels seem to get the grease.
Had enough? Ready to tap out of the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) fight for funds?  I think I’ll give it a rest at this point, and wait for questions and comments. Once readers digest this, I will give it another go in a few days and write a post about the Bike Fed’s suggestions for how we might create a more balanced, equitable and sustainably funded transportation system. Until then, I look forward to your comments and I will do my best to answer any further questions.